rhu: (Default)
[personal profile] rhu

OK, let's get a good discussion going here. :-)

The other night, [livejournal.com profile] introverte and I were discussing film adapations of science fiction stories that originally appeared in print. We were unable to come up with a single example of a story that meets all these criteria:

  • Science fiction (not fantasy) (excluding, for example, The Lord of the Rings and The Wizard of Oz)
  • First appeared in print (excluding, for example, 2001: A Space Odyssey)
  • Movie adaptation remains essentially faithful to the print story (excluding, for example, We Can Remember It for You Wholesale, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, I, Robot, etc.)
  • Both the original print story and the movie adaptation are generally accepted as great (excluding, for example, well, most others).

The closest I could come up with was Farenheit 451 but I'm not sure the movie really qualifies as great. But I figure that if there exists a true example, you, gentle readers, will let me know.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-11 04:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kradical.livejournal.com
Uhm, why doesn't 2001 count? It did start out as a prose story: "The Sentinel" by Arthur C. Clarke.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-11 05:10 pm (UTC)
ext_87516: (Default)
From: [identity profile] 530nm330hz.livejournal.com
Perhaps I was misinformed. I thought the novel was written concurrently with the shooting of the movie. Was "The Sentinel" essentially the same story as the entire movie? Amazon describes it as "The story that inspired 2001: A Space Odyssey" which would violate criterion 3.

(Hmmm... Criterion III sounds almost like it could be the name of a con.)

Profile

rhu: (Default)
Andrew M. Greene

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags