In today's NYTimes (and Friday's)
Oct. 5th, 2008 10:58 amIs Frank Rich insinuating what I think he's insinuating? Scary.
In the Arts section, a cappella gets some respect.
In Friday's paper, Ben Brantley wrote the kind of rave review theatre producers would kill for.
If anyone out there signed up for TimesPeople and wants to become TimesPeopleFriends, I'm signed up under my real name and hometown.
In the Arts section, a cappella gets some respect.
In Friday's paper, Ben Brantley wrote the kind of rave review theatre producers would kill for.
If anyone out there signed up for TimesPeople and wants to become TimesPeopleFriends, I'm signed up under my real name and hometown.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-05 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-05 06:01 pm (UTC)And I would add the Nylons to that list.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-05 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 01:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 02:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 02:59 am (UTC)Mind, it's been explicitly suggested, though I find that article to border on the slanderous. The misspeakings that piece refers to in no way resemble the word-based aphasia described as a symptom; the "poor judgment" evidence is purely partisan; misplacing a personal item is not the same as putting an iron in the freezer as if it belongs there.
Rich's evidence doesn't seem any more solid: I don't think repeating a canned joke is evidence of a mental disorder, nor is a hostile countenance during a debate; and the "confusing proper nouns that begin with S" is a cheap shot.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 01:56 pm (UTC)The point at which my "skeptical reader alarm bells" went off was when he cited Palin's admiration for Bush pere, since we all know what was afflicting Ronald Regan, wink wink.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 04:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-06 10:35 pm (UTC)