Pop quiz

Aug. 6th, 2010 08:22 am
rhu: (Default)
[personal profile] rhu
Unscientific sample here, but: Without looking it up, do you know what the phrase "stare decisis" means?

Nope

Date: 2010-08-06 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] euphud.livejournal.com
I certainly knew the concept, but I had to look up the phrase. I figured it had to do with "decision," but that was about as far as I got.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 12:32 pm (UTC)
sethg: a petunia flower (Default)
From: [personal profile] sethg
It means the same thing that it meant yesterday.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 12:35 pm (UTC)

*laugh*

Date: 2010-08-06 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] temvald.livejournal.com
Good answer. (And yes.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 42itous.livejournal.com
Never heard of it.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bookishfellow.livejournal.com
I can infer something about what it means by dredging up memories of my 5-week intensive Latin class, but I'm also pretty sure there are technical overtones I don't understand.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Nope.

JCBC

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com
What's the point of "stare decisis" if you are enjoined from looking things up?

(Yes, I did.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autotruezone.livejournal.com
When my mom was in law school (and I was in elementary school), the law students would put on a play every year. The year after Star Wars (the original) came out, their play was called Law Wars, or Starry Decisis.

So, yes.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:37 pm (UTC)
sethg: a petunia flower (Default)
From: [personal profile] sethg
“I feel a great disturbance in the courts... as if millions of plaintiffs filed complaints in terror and were suddenly dismissed on 12(b)(6) motions....”

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:38 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
I believe it means that, once a legal decision is made, you're really stuck with the precedent, except in REALLY weird situations.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magid.livejournal.com
Have heard it before, but the meaning hasn't stuck for me.

Without checking comments...

Date: 2010-08-06 02:01 pm (UTC)
cnoocy: green a-e ligature (Default)
From: [personal profile] cnoocy
I believe it is part of a larger Latin formula, but the phrase itself is "to stand by means of decided things". As a legal term, I think it refers to the court's preference to let preceding decisions stand, not to overturn unless there is a good reason.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autotruezone.livejournal.com
Actually, I remember almost nothing of the plot, other than that the heroine was Princess Soia, a play on the name of the then-dean of the law school, Soia Mentschikoff.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danchall.myvidoop.com (from livejournal.com)
Yes, I knew that.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rikchik.livejournal.com
IIRC it's the legal principle that generally once a court decides something other courts don't overrule them without a good reason. (Now to read other comments and see if I'm right.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pocketnaomi.livejournal.com
Yes, both in its literal translation and in its legal context, but I was raised by lawyers and took Mr. Kizner's Latin class.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michelel72.livejournal.com
Um. Something to do with a legal judgment, maybe? I think "court, judge" but would have to look it up specifically if I needed to know it.

(Now checks other comments.) Okay, at least I wasn't too far off.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-06 10:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rubrick.livejournal.com
Late to the party, but I knew what it meant from recent Supreme Court nomination hearings (or rather from synopses thereof; I can't stand listening to senators talk).

Profile

rhu: (Default)
Andrew M. Greene

January 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags