Is this a good puzzle type?
Aug. 6th, 2010 04:46 pmI had an idea for a word/logic puzzle. I don't trust my judgment as to whether it's reasonable or waaay too hard. If only I had friends who love hard puzzles who could try it out and tell me what they think....
So we're all familiar with word ladders; in particular I'm thinking of the restricted kind where all the words are the same length and the only legal operation is to replace one letter with another; what in the Enigma would be tagged a PROGRESSIVE LETTER CHANGE. A classic example:
1. L E S S 2. L O S S 3. L O S E 4. L O V E 5. M O V E 6. M O R E
So what I'm wondering is: given only the list of letters that change in each step, can you reconstruct the start and end words? (For the above example, you'd be given (4) OEVMR) I think the end would be moderately easy but the start would be somewhat hard.
Here are two samples. Please give them a try if you feel like it and share your thoughts on whether, as a puzzle, it's (a) reasonably solvable, and (b) fun. And if I'm reinventing the wheel, please tell me!
Puzzle 1: (4 letters) FRMAW [one step is a proper noun] Puzzle 2: (5 letters) LASRPSOBD
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 09:15 pm (UTC)I made a couple of assumptions. 1) The list of letters will contain all letters of the end word. 2) The start word is the opposite in meaning of the end word, or otherwise known as its partner.
If these assumptions were to break down, and/or if the ladder were to meander beyond a certain level, then the puzzle would be a lot harder for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 09:37 pm (UTC)I'm curious what candidates you considered for the final word in #2.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 09:41 pm (UTC)It did take a few minutes to plan my approach, but the 4-letter puzzle seemed easy. I haven't tried the 5-letter one yet.
So, yes, it seems solvable and yes, it was fun. And no, I haven't seen this type of puzzle before.
JCBC
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 10:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 10:24 pm (UTC)I found the instructions a little confusing; "list of letters that change" sounds like the list of "before" letters, not "after" letters (if you change an A to an E, it's the A that changes). The example set me straight.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 10:38 pm (UTC)Still haven't tried the 5-letter one yet.
JCBC
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-06 11:13 pm (UTC)Overall it's a cute enough idea, but it felt a bit more like work than play to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-07 09:01 am (UTC)V jbhyqa'g unir pbzr hc jvgu gur svefg jbeq tvira zl nffhzcgvbaf (naq va snpg nonaqbarq gur svany jbeq pnaqvqngr orpnhfr vg qvqa'g frrz gb unir n fvatyr cnegare).
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-07 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-08 06:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-09 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-09-05 05:27 pm (UTC)Was trying to think of a way to make it easier without making it too easy. Perhaps A) alphabetize the "after" letters and B) provide a grid that shows which letter changes at each step? So, for instance, for puzzle 2:
ABDLOPRSS
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ * _
_ _ * _ _
* _ _ _ _
_ _ _ * _
_ * _ _ _
_ _ _ _ *
_ * _ _ _
* _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ *
(Of course, since I already solved it, I can't tell if that's actually any easier.)