Potemkin health coverage

[rhu]

So as I understand it, the so-called groundbreaking law passed this week here in Massachusetts is a triumph for insurance companies and politicians. I don't see how it helps the uninsured.

• Employers who don't offer insurance will be fined $300 per employee per year. Since insurance premiums are about ten times that, I don't see how this will incentivize any employer who hasn't already chosen to offer insurance to do so.
• Individuals who choose not to purchase insurance will lose their $150 per person exemption on their state income taxes. Again, if a healthy well-off twenty-something chooses to self-insure rather than pay premiums, this won't change that person's calculations.
• Individuals who can't afford to buy insurance, even once the government certifies one or more insurance plans as "affordable" (which is yet to be defined), are the ones who will be most hurt by losing the $150.

So congratulations to Presidentialcandidate (formerly known as Governor) Romney and the Great and General Court for getting adulatory press for "providing universal coverage" by imposing an unfunded mandate on the individual citizen.

After all, if it's illegal to be uninsured, only criminals will lack health coverage.