The only thing that stuck out to me was the phrase "affluent Greenwich Village." But god knows *I* can't afford to live there, so when I meet someone from the Village I assume they're either doing pretty well or living like a rat with three roommates in a closet.
Of course, I'm sure things were different when the fake Senator was born, so I assume that's what you're shooting for. When I read it, I immediately thought, "alternate history." So that's my vote. Good eye, though!
Ok, I don't have an LJ account, but I don't see any picture. I do, however, see the words "this picture" as a link to a New Frontiersman article entitled "Senator Keene Acts". Is he in the movie?
"This picture" is intended to be a link, with "this" referring to the thing the link points to, which is a .jpg of an article; a .jpg is a picture. Geez.
There's a factual impossibility in the article's text.
Well, the guy was born in 1930 and at was Hunter College High School at age 12, and Wikipedia tells me that school was girls-only and didn't go co-ed until 1974. (I thought maybe it was that HCHS didn't open until the 70s or something, so if I hadn't fact-checked my answer I would've been wrong ....)
I believe the episode where New York's senators were moved from Class 1 and Class 3 to Class 2 ad Class 4 was covered in an extremely dull issue of "What If?"
How about "the writing is so atrocious and full of typos that no editor would have let it go through"? "Keene was born 1930", "the seat of New York"...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:14 pm (UTC)Of course, I'm sure things were different when the fake Senator was born, so I assume that's what you're shooting for. When I read it, I immediately thought, "alternate history." So that's my vote. Good eye, though!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:17 pm (UTC)It probably helps to have grown up in the city, or to have children there now, as opposed to moving there as an adult.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:08 pm (UTC)What picture?
Date: 2009-02-26 04:27 pm (UTC)-pd
Re: What picture?
Date: 2009-02-26 04:30 pm (UTC)There's a factual impossibility in the article's text.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 04:59 pm (UTC)That sentence uses "to table" in the British rather than the American sense. But I don't know what that has to do with New York.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-27 06:53 am (UTC)(I now retire to my Fortress of Geekitude.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 06:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 07:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 10:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 09:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-26 11:52 pm (UTC)